Skip to content

Use default rebaseWhen for renovate#1673

Merged
edenhaus merged 1 commit into
devfrom
renovate-rebase
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

Use default rebaseWhen for renovate#1673
edenhaus merged 1 commit into
devfrom
renovate-rebase

Conversation

@edenhaus

@edenhaus edenhaus commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 30, 2026 20:44
@edenhaus edenhaus added the pr: refactor PR with code refactoring label Jun 30, 2026
@edenhaus
edenhaus merged commit 81156bf into dev Jun 30, 2026
8 checks passed
@edenhaus
edenhaus deleted the renovate-rebase branch June 30, 2026 20:45
Copilot AI reviewed Jun 30, 2026
View reviewed changes

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR simplifies the Renovate configuration by removing an explicit rebaseWhen setting so Renovate will use its default rebase behavior.

Changes:

  • Removed "rebaseWhen": "behind-base-branch" from .github/renovate.json.
  • Left the rest of the Renovate configuration unchanged (including pre-commit integration).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.02%. Comparing base (a0d9b80) to head (4288c6c).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #1673   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.02%   95.02%           
=======================================
  Files         159      159           
  Lines        6234     6234           
  Branches      353      353           
=======================================
  Hits         5924     5924           
  Misses        248      248           
  Partials       62       62

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will improve performance by 9.13%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

#### 🎉 Hooray! `pytest-codspeed` just leveled up to 5.0.3!

A heads-up, this is a breaking change and it might affect your current performance baseline a bit. But here's the exciting part - it's packed with new, cool features and promises improved result stability 🥳!
Curious about what's new? Visit our releases page to delve into all the awesome details about this new version.

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
✅ 108 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ test_decompress_base64_data_zstd[1] 42.8 µs 38.7 µs +10.4%
⚡ test_decompress_base64_data_lzma[2] 45.2 µs 41.3 µs +9.43%
⚡ test_decompress_base64_data_lzma[1] 49.4 µs 45.2 µs +9.23%
⚡ test_decompress_base64_data_lzma[3] 52.8 µs 48.7 µs +8.33%
⚡ test_decompress_base64_data_lzma[4] 55.7 µs 51.4 µs +8.28%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing renovate-rebase (4288c6c) with dev (f11d2c6)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on dev (fffb7f5) during the generation of this report, so f11d2c6 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

pr: refactor PR with code refactoring

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@edenhaus